Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Alphons van Werven wrote: > > I'm still half waiting for someone with misguided delusions of moral > > superiority to delete that port, thinking it's their decision to make > > that FreeBSD must not enable people to display their system load as a > > cartoon woman in various stages of undress. > > <FACEPALM> > > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency.
"Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms is Offensive. > There's no "censorship" if the FreeBSD developers make a collective > decision that they don't want to be associated with juvenile junk Some will consider games/* & misc/jive etc juvenile, & other ports offensive for licence or many other reasons. Tolerate them all, Live & let live. The vast majority of commiters are innocent. Just a few ports butchers have degraded FreeBSD, removing working ports in last few years. Rather than delete or move sensitive ports to a new SUBDIR, causing disruption, & SVN work, Add a flag to bsd.port.mk like NO_CDROM eg SENSITIVE= (like a TV / Cinema adults only flag). > that makes them look like a bunch of out-of-touch clueless old white > guys; Inflamatory language degrades, Mature language builds. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
