On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Kurt Jaeger <li...@opsec.eu> wrote: > Hi! > >> This probably requires a new port (protobuf30), as it crosses a major >> version boundary (2.x -> 3.x) and judging by the presence of separate >> protobuf (2.6.x) and protobuf25 port. > > As far as I studied the issue, a new version is not required. See > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212973
Tanks! :-) It looks that 2 and 3 have different API. Keeping 'protobuf' up to date and leaving 'protobuf2' for legacy reasons seems to be reasonable.. :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
