On 3/12/2016 12:46 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote on 12/02/2016 17:19:
On 29/11/2016 1:57 PM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote on 11/29/2016 08:34:
Ruslan, I'm just wondering if the 404 is supposed to be removed
from the
email address....
I have it running but it insists on installing the entire JDK. Is it
possible to use just the JRE?
If I understand correctly there is no way to depend just upon JRE in
Mk/bsd.java.mk, so this is the reason why it depends upon the whole
JDK. But you may try something like
that would seem odd there must be hundreds of packages that just want
the runtime.
Maybe someone in ports@ can comment? (CC'd)
-USE_JAVA= yes
-JAVA_VERSION= 1.7+
+JAVA=/usr/local/openjdk7/bin/java
+BUILD_DEPENDS+=java/openjdk7-jre
+RUN_DEPENDS+=java/openjdk7-jre
to build a local package that only depends upon JRE 1.7.
also the 1.7+ in effect means 1.8. even if 1.7 is installed the pkg
will force an install of 1.8.
Afaik the address is correct. I was able to google some of his
mailing
list submissions from that email:
https://marc.info/?a=137339713800014&r=1&w=4
If there would be no response from Sergey till the end of the week,
I'll try to answer myself. Maybe jython port just needs some
actualization in respect of JRE version. As far I understand, the
problem you are expecting was introduced into ports infrastructure at
some point after the jython update.
Btw, has you tried to just build the port itself with enforcing
version 1.7? I'm not yet sure, but it looks like java 1.8 is now
default java version in ports tree. This is why pkg insisting on
installation of 1.8
On 29/11/2016 1:24 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 23/11/2016 5:32 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Hi Julian,
Julian Elischer wrote on 11/22/2016 09:46:
Firstly thanks for having done hte last jython update
you say in the notes that it should work with the 1.7 java.
but hte
pkg wants the openJDK8.0 as a dependency.
so a couple of questions:
Firstly do we need the entire JDK? is the JRE not enough?
Secondly, how do we make it use the openJDK7-JRE that is already
installed on the machine?
we don't have the room for the full JDK, and certainly not for
two
whole
copies (7 and 8).
thanks
Julian jul...@freebsd.org with $JOB hat on.
while I committed the update, the patch wasn't mine: I just
checked
the build etc. I added original submitter to cc in hope he'll
be able
to clarify the situation.
Sergey, would you elaborate on JDK/JRE and 1.7/1.8 questions?
Thank
you!
Hi Sergey,
thanks..
I guess my question is: will pkg complain if 7 is installed and not
8? (or do I need both?) and do I need to do anything special to
make
it work with 7?
Julian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
