On 5/01/2017 6:44 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
both samba44
and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
Or samba44 and KDE?
If yes, then that sucks...
similar happened recently with the two jpeg libraries.
They can't be installed at the same time but some packages wanted
one and some the other.
Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and
set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With
binary packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no
longer see removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to
justify the complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved
build time to disable this dependency (e.g. a bad security track
record/process, different licenses)?
_______________________
no, I think the "solution" is to think of an architectural way around
this.
One thought:
maybe we can have a 'virtual dependency" that more than one package
can satisfy?
the USES stuff seems to be heading in that direction. Maybe someone
who knows more about it can tell us more about it?
I'd also like to see packages have more htan one way to install, to
give the same effect as the linux -devel and regular packages.
pkg install --runtime vs pkg install --devel
(and I'd like to see a --minimal, no docs, examples etc.)
Each would have their own depednencies as well, probably building up
from minimal->runtime->devel
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
