Hi Adam. Thank you for your quick response, and sorry for my late reply.
From: Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> Subject: Re: Official opinion about new py3- port Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 15:33:42 -0600 > An exception does exist for when a py3 port is a required > dependency, which it sounds like is the case here. Can you confirm > that the current ports postfix-policyd-spf-python (1.3.2) fails on > python 3.6? Do you mean the issue reported by following PR? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220470 If so, I couldn't reproduce it with my mail server. I submitted PR to update mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python simply because I found newer version is released. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
