Quoting Stefan Esser <s...@freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:35:24 +0200):
Am 26.09.17 um 16:05 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:Hi, **Do not commit FLAVORS to any ports, a hook will prevent it, that being said, do try it and test what can be done.** To test this feature in poudriere, you need poudriere-devel-3.1.99.20170621 or later. This has been a long awaiting feature, most of the work has been done by bapt, bdrewery and antoine, I am just the one actually doing the announce and commit and all. All this information, and more to come are in the first link to our wiki in the bottom block. A roadmap is in the second link. To define a different flavors in a port, before any include, set: FLAVORS= flavor1 flavor2 [...] The first flavor in the list will be the default.One question regarding the naming of packages: The default flavour should probably(?) lead to a package with the same name as created without flavours.
This implies either an implicit default flavor-name, or stripping of the flavor-name in the package-name if it is the first listed flavor.
And if a flavor-ised port gets a different name, shouldn't we standardize on the name of the default-flavor (which makes it obsolete to list in FLAVORS then)?
Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netch...@freebsd.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
pgpP8XU_Fw0hV.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
