On 04/10/2017 19:40, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:57:08PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote:
On 10/04/17 14:14, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Poudriere really needs its own small book. Yes, you can do simple
poudriere installs, but once you start covering it properly the docs
quickly expand. My notes alone are longer than my af3e chapter
limits. (I'll probably publish "FreeBSD Packaging Misery^WMastery" in
2018).
Please include a discussion on how to use poudriere on
a system with limited resouces [...]
​Pretty sure the standard response will be along the lines of:​ [...]
Some users cannot afford a 16-core, 32 GB ram, 2TB diskspace box
to simply build ports with custom options.  [...]
While I agree with you, allow me to insert a gentle reminder that the
OP was asking only about whether to include portmaster in his book.
I suggest that he should.                                 -- George
Ahem, yeah, so I'm not allowed to request a short description
on how to use poudiere in a resource constrained environment?


The environment isn't constrained by poudriere but by the ports you want to compile. When compiling libreoffice or chromium or firefox I don't think there is anything else that can be done than setting poudriere to run no more than 1 job at a time. Poudriere itself doesn't take any additional resources, it's just a dedicated jail and a bunch of scripts.

I would rather say that the amount of resources poudriere takes to compile stuff is normal, the baseline. Portmaster or portupgrade make a compromise - unstable compilation environment for some additional memory to compile especially resource hungry ports.

What I am trying to say is that there isn't probably much to discuss. However, explaining the difference between portmaster/portupgrade and poudriere and how to plan computer resources for compiling various sizes of ports may be more useful?

GrzegorzJ
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to