On 12/06/17 04:53, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 05/12/2017 à 23:25, Baho Utot a écrit :
On 12/05/17 17:09, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 05/12/2017 à 10:53, Aryeh Friedman a écrit :
TL;DR;
Flavors <bleep>'ed up ports and there are no good ways/alternates
for how
to use the ports collection for normal everyday users/maintainers
Thank you for supporting all the hard work and countless hours that so
many volunteers put in making the ports tree better.
It really helps motivate all of us continue bringing the ports tree
forward when we get emails with so much joy and positive attitude.
Thank you for taking a perfectly good system and breaking it as well
as making it unusable, unstable. You just don't know of all the
countless hours spent after running an update and taking a week to get
it working again.
It really helps motivate all of us users to continue to have to fix
broken systems due to broken ports system and then be told how great
things are, brings us so much joy and keeps our attitude positive.
For the users using binary packages, poudriere, or the ports tree
directly nothing changed.
For users of third party abandonware, well, they were warned that it was
bound to happen at one point, and guess what, it happened. I don't
really understand why you continue spending all this time complaining
whereas switching to, say, poudriere, would have taken you about 5 minutes.
Because I am a cranky old fart. Anyway of all the things that you
posted nothing applies
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
