On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Adam Weinberger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 Dec, 2017, at 20:03, Walter Schwarzenfeld <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> But >> >> RUBY_RELVERSION= 2.3.6 >> RUBY_PORTREVISION= 0 <= >> RUBY_PORTEPOCH= 1 >> RUBY_PATCHLEVEL= 0 >> RUBY23= "" # PLIST_SUB helpers >> >> PORTREVISION=0 confuses pkg version >> >> pkg version |grep ruby23 >> ruby23-2.3.6,1 < >> >> this is the version which is installed. >> > > PORTREVISION=0 is treated as if it were unset. Some people prefer using > that construct because it keeps line numbers consistent in the SVN history. > > # Adam The Porters Handbook now calls for the use of portrevision=0. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
