## Miroslav Lachman (000.f...@quip.cz):
The whole thing looks phishy.
> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by llvm60-6.0.1_3 for building
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for llvm-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for cfe-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
Do you use non-default options? That list is much longer here, like
===> Fetching all distfiles required by llvm60-6.0.1_3 for building
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for llvm-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for cfe-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for compiler-rt-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for clang-tools-extra-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for lld-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for lldb-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for openmp-6.0.1.src.tar.xz.
===========================================================================
> =======================<phase: patch >============================
> ===> Patching for llvm60-6.0.1_3
> ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/llvm60/files/clang
And that's strange as files/clang is a directory.
> OS on the host is 11.2 amd64, building jail is 10.4 amd64
Ah. 10.4 went EOL on November 1st. Are you sure the older "patch"
from that FreeBSD can handle the patches imported a week ago?
You could try adding "gpatch:devel/patch" as PATCH_DEPENDS and
setting "PATCH=${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpatch" (see math/mpfr for an
example).
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
