On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 13:25, bob prohaska <f...@www.zefox.net> wrote: [...] > Is there a resolution to this dilemma, other than just waiting for > inkscape to catch up? Is it possible to determine which revision of > the ports tree can make a runnable version of a particular port?
The correct thing to do is to build a set of local package repository for your RPI3 system using synth or poudriere. It appears that some of your locally installed packages are out of sync with the ports-tree, and that is a common problem with using non-chrooted/jailed port-builders. I've just built a runnable version of inkscape, so I'm pretty sure the problem is at your end rather than the ports tree. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen <j...@chen.org.nz> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
