Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on
Sun Jul 28 17:21:00 UTC 2019 :
> I used "portmaster -a". The problem is that all ports compiled with gcc had
> PORTREVISION bumped. Most do not have a run-time dependency on gcc.
Going in different direction than other responses
that I saw . . .
# pkg info gcc9
gcc9-9.1.0
. . .
Shared Libs provided:
libcc1.so.0
libssp.so.0
libobjc.so.4
libcc1plugin.so.0
libstdc++.so.6
libitm.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1
libquadmath.so.0
libcp1plugin.so.0
liblto_plugin.so.0
libgomp.so.1
libatomic.so.1
libgfortran.so.5
. . .
# ls -c1 /usr/local/lib/gcc9/*.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libatomic.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libcc1.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libgcc_s.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libgfortran.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libgomp.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libitm.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libobjc.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libquadmath.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libssp.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc9/libstdc++.so
Anything linked with any of those .so libraries does
have a runtime (library) dependency on gcc9, even if
it does not run a gcc9/gcc9++ compiler.
How many libraries and programs in ports are
compiled/built by gcc9 but that do not use any of those
.so libraries? (This may be roughly: how many have a
static-linking context?)
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
