On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Even if it's possible to bend ports/mail/mailman to support Mailman3 > Please do not do it; keep it clean for just Mailman2 > (Else it would cause big run time problems for user admins (inc. me)). > > Any who will want Mailman3 should please clone ports/mail/mailman to > ports/mail/mailman3 (not ports/mail/mailman2) & work there. Thanks
There is not yet a port for Mailman3, but the one that is in progress looks like it will go into mail/mailman3 when complete. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225543 This should not cause any conflicts for Mailman2 users. -- Greg Veldman free...@gregv.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
