On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 22:55, Erwin Lansing<er...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing<er...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > LATEST_LINK          PORTNAME                       MAINTAINER
>> > ==========================================================================
>> > py25-bsddb           databases/py-bsddb             pe...@freebsd.org
>> > py25-bsddb           databases/py25-bsddb           pyt...@freebsd.org
>>
>> I think these two are not an issue.  Default Python version is switched to 
>> 2.6.
>>
>> But how this report generated?  Switching happened before
>> databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied.
>>
> The script is in Tools/scripts/check-latest-link.  Could this be caused
> by the installed python version on the system it runs on?

Sounds possible, and that's what bsd.python.mk does.
databases/py25-bsddb is a slave port of databases/py-bsddb,
which generates python 2.5 package for some ports depend on
specified python version.  When a system with python 2.5
as the default setting, databases/py-bsddb and databases/py25-bsddb
should generate same package.  So now the problem is, is it OK for them
have same LATEST_LINK?  Or we can just ignore this problem, since this
should not effect official package build, and the latest links on the ftp.

-- 
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to