Great, I also found this last night. :) So it seems no problem now. Now what on my mind is, should we provide options for making different builds? Default "mu" is great, and I think it would be even better to provide "d" for debugging.
-- lwhsu On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 14:18:28 +0800, wen heping wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> > Date: 2011/2/22 > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Is Demo directory removed from python3.2 ? > To: wen heping <wenhep...@gmail.com> > 抄送： python-...@python.org > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, wen heping <wenhep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > ?? I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version: > > ?? i) Demo directory removed > > ?? ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1 ??changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1 > > Others have answered your first question, but the latter is part of PEP 3149: > http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.2.html#pep-3149-abi-version-tagged-so-files > > In addition to allowing multiple builds of extension modules to exist > in parallel, PEP 3149 allows multiple builds of Python itself (with > different build options) to coexist. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan???? |???? ncogh...@gmail.com???? |???? Brisbane, Australia > > > > -- > 真理��??????有???胜?????????，真理只有在???持??????的人死去后才成???真理。 -- Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org> http://lwhsu.org
pgpJFmX8Lc6Ot.pgp
Description: PGP signature
