On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> HOWEVER, it doesn't answer the question of packages for 3.x. Is the >> policy "there can be (mostly) only one set of packages for Python >> modules, and that is for the preferred version"? > > It's a code limitation rather than policy. We would have to run two > back-to-back bulk builds, one with the switch thrown one way, and one > with it the other. The builds are scheduled off the hierarchy as > built via 'make index', and thus two different INDEX files are required. > > It could be done but it's kind of a PITA with the way things are set up, > so we had never really considered doing it.
Drat, but that makes sense. It would be a PITA, now that I think about how it would need to happen. > You might want to look at the just-added port ports-mgmt/poudriere to > see if it would help your problem locally. Or even globally; this could work. I'll think more about it. --Paul Hoffman_______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
