Hi Li-Wen,

Li-Wen Hsu wrote on 02.09.2012 14:03:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-...@yandex.ru> wrote:
Hi,

I'm preparing an update of www/plone and discovered thing that's need to be
changed to make USE_ZOPE knob actually work. We do not define ZOPESKELDIR
anymore, so the RUN_DEPENDS line should be fixed.
While here, trim some leftover from py24/25 removal, that's now always true
in current ports tree. Would you please approve this change?

PS. It doesn't needed an exp-run because at the time there is no ports, that
use USE_ZOPE.

Looks good to me, and if you don't mind, how about doing this:

     RUN_DEPENDS+=      ${LOCALBASE}/bin/zopectl:${ZOPE_PORTSDIR}

in this way:

     RUN_DEPENDS+=      zope213>0:${ZOPE_PORTSDIR}

or even replace this:

     ZOPE_PORTSDIR=     ${PORTSDIR}/www/zope213

with:

     ZOPE_DEPENDS=      zope213>0:${PORTSDIR}/www/zope213

and then, .if defined(USE_ZOPE) section can be written as:

     RUN_DEPENDS+=      ${ZOPE_DEPENDS}

How do you think?


I believe that original intention was not to hardcode the zope port version. Yes, there is only one zope version at the moment, but there may be more in future. Just though about ports that needs different zope versions. Please tell me if I understand it wrong.

--
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to