On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:17:24PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > On 07 окт. 2014 г., at 13:12, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:10:56PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > >> > >> On 29 сент. 2014 г., at 12:01, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:52:50AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> I am using FreeBSD-10/stable and pkg-1.3.8. > >>>> > >>>> Consider py-dateutil port, it depends on py-six. > >>>> > >>>> First, I installed py33-dateutil (with py33-six), for python3. > >>>> > >>>> Now I install py-dateutil for python2. Upon installation, I get the > >>>> following waring: > >>>> ===> Installing for py27-dateutil-2.2 > >>>> ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-six>0 - found > >>>> ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found > >>>> ===> py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - > >>>> found > >>>> ===> Checking if py27-dateutil already installed > >>>> ===> Registering installation for py27-dateutil-2.2 > >>>> pkg-static: py27-dateutil-2.2: duplicate dependency listing: > >>>> py33-six-1.5.2, ignoring > >>>> > >>>> When I try to deinstall py27-six, I get: > >>>> > >>>> # pkg delete py27-six > >>>> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > >>>> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 3 packages (of 0 > >>>> packages in the universe): > >>>> > >>>> Installed packages to be REMOVED: > >>>> py27-six-1.8.0 > >>>> py33-dateutil-2.1_3 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0) > >>>> py27-dateutil-2.2 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0) > >>>> > >>>> The operation will free 1 MB. > >>>> > >>>> Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: > >>>> > >>>> (it wants to deinstall both versions of py-dateutil). > >>>> > >>>> Something looks broken here. > >>>> > >>>> Some time ago it did not let to install the same port for different > >>>> python version, now it is possible but deps registration looks broken. > >>> > >>> I do not have time for this right now, I'll see in a couple of days, but > >>> CCing > >>> parties that should be interested :) > >>> > >> > >> > >> Can you reproduce this or is this a problem on my side? > > > > Bryan has fixed it iirc, this was a port bug. > > > > > What commit do you mean? I just updated ports tree, installed pkg-1.3.8_3, > and I see the same issue. >
Then I misunderstood the commit I'll have a look now at your case :) regards, Bapt
pgpYTlMnbtRiD.pgp
Description: PGP signature