https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227836
Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|--- |Normal
See Also| |https://github.com/saltstac
| |k/salt/issues/47006
Status|New |Open
Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(christ
| |er.edwa...@gmail.com)
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People
CC| |christer.edwa...@gmail.com,
| |pyt...@freebsd.org
Summary|sysutils/py-salt : update |sysutils/py-salt : update
|to 2018.3.0_2 [maintainer] |to 2018.3.0_2
Keywords| |needs-qa
--- Comment #9 from Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> ---
@Christer
I don't believe the proposed approach will be appropriate:
1) Wont these compiled files be created at first run, leaving leftovers after
pkg-deletion? QA (poudriere) wouldn't pick these up as salt would not have run
between installation/deinstallation.
2) Has upstream fixed this issue upstream since reporting? If so, can you point
us to any other issue(s) and/or commit(s) ?
Also, please remember to set maintainer-approval flag to + on attachments for
ports you maintain
Also noted from the upstream issue:
@jhujhiti says:
"Specifically, f_noext = f_noext.replace(BIN_PRE_EXT, '') is an attempt to
ignore the extra bits in the filename of a bytecode file, but it only removes
cpython-36, so we end up loading a module named fx2.opt-1."
Has there been an attempt to fix that section of the code to not load/match the
optimized file?
It appears that that is the root cause, and addressing that will be the
correct, appropriate and permanent fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
