Why would you want to do that? I can think of no reason to use both other than some of the supplemental features of ipfw like bandwidth shaping.
Tom Veldhouse ----- Original Message ----- From: "ksrgyn -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:58 PM Subject: IPFW and IpFilter > > Hi, > > I have a problem where the ipfw and ipfilter can not work together. > I need the packages matching first in the rules of ipfw and after in the > rules of ipfiter. > I configure my kernel with ipfw options before ipfilter options and i > compile but don't work, then i try to compile my kernel with the ipfw > options and without ipfilter options that was loaded as a module, and don't > work too. > The packages must be checked first in IPFW and then they need to be > checked in ipfilter. They are not being checked in IPFW, what's the problem > ? > > This is what i find in IPFILTER FAQ: > > IPF and IPFW both have features I want to use, must I choose between them? > No. You can run them both on a single machine. However, you must take care > to ensure that one package's rules do not interfere with the other's. Note > that the packages get access to rules in the order in which they were > loaded, e.g. if IPFW is compiled in the kernel and IPF is loaded as a > module, IPFW "sees" packets before IPF. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tenha você também um MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do mundo: > http://www.hotmail.com/br > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
