Bart Silverstrim writes: > If it doesn't say, the list is referring to the generic > off-the-f'ing-shelf version.
I _have_ the generic, off-the-shelf version of this PC. > Very good. And if you take one of them whining about a problem, they > point at the list and say, "Tough Sh*t." No, they don't. They point out that they can't support your configuration. Sometimes they offer suggestions, anyway, sometimes they don't. They just aren't _obligated_ to provide any support. > Yes, that's exactly what he's saying when properly twisted. Even without twisting, that seemed to be the clear meaning. > If "superior design" consists solely of ignoring problems > or ignoring glitches in hardware, then you have a real gem. No, I was referring to the additional modularity and stability made possible by the additional abstraction of a HAL. -- Anthony _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"