On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:29:37PM +0000, mail.schatti.ch wrote:
> If you had to choose amongst the available filesystems on 5.4 to contain
> just about 500kB to a MB, which would you use, and with what parameters ?
> Which of these has the lowest administration overhead, the lowest space
> overhead ?
One thing going for FAT32 for portable media is that it can be read and
written reliably by any major OS on the market now - Linux, OS X, or of
course Windows XP/NT or 98. You could view that as a positive or
negative depending on the application.
-- Clifton
--
Clifton Royston -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tiki Technologies Lead Programmer/Software Architect
"I'm gonna tell my son to grow up pretty as the grass is green
And whip-smart as the English Channel's wide..."
-- 'Whip-Smart', Liz Phair
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
