On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > It's great if you like your server applications to be twice as > complicated > as before. Seriously, though, you can turn off all the fru-fru and > set it up pretty much equivalent to a samba 2 server. The fru-fru is > needed if you have a lot of XP stuff and you want to interoperate with a > Microsoft AD. > > Ted > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger Merritt > > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 7:40 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3 > > > > > > I've just become aware that samba.org is no longer supporting Samba 2 > > (which has served me well for so long) and I should upgrade to > > Samba 3, > > which is now the stable version. I don't find any warnings about it in > > /usr/ports/UPDATING. Does anyone have any gotchas I should be aware of? > >
I recently heard a lecture about the evolution of Samba 4. Seems to me you can't understand it unless your are Microsoft certified systems engineer with lots of special active directory knowledge ... ;-) Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
