On Monday, 30 May 2005 at 9:39:04 +0930, Tim Aslat wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:26 +0930 > Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Nowhere is a good place to send 10 MB of illegible log output. Please >> don't. > > I agree. > >> Do you really expect people to read this? It's incorrectly coded, and >> it's far too long. Many people pay for their mail; you have cost me >> personally $2.00 to download this message. > > Knowing what kind of setup you have Greg, I can believe that. > > Although it has opened up a rather large can of worms. Can the list > maintainers restrict message sizes to less than a meg? I honestly > can't imagine any possible reason for sending an attachment larger than > 500K (shar files, etc) to a public mailing list. > > Is it worth looking into doing this, or am I barking up the wrong > metaphor?
I suppose it's reasonable. On the other hand, in my recollection this is the first time this has happened. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgprj5gzU1Su8.pgp
Description: PGP signature