On 20/01/06 Kevin Kinsey said: > I'd almost offer "definitely more likely", as the amount of swap > shown is less than 1/2 GB. Michael, how much RAM on this box?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sysctl -a | grep Memory Virtual Memory: (Total: 720K, Active 537852K) Real Memory: (Total: 236228K Active 123640K) Shared Virtual Memory: (Total: 24812K Active: 11880K) Shared Real Memory: (Total: 12136K Active: 6672K) Free Memory Pages: 11692K Mem: 124M Active, 25M Inact, 75M Wired, 10M Cache, 34M Buf, 768K Free Swap: 471M Total, 67M Used, 403M Free, 14% Inuse It's not a lot, but it's always been fine for me when running Linux as a headless server. > I once set up a box with 256M RAM and 512M swap, which was > all good && fine until I got a few extra $$ and decided to up the > RAM to 768M. After that, it died most every evening with Xorg > running out of swapspace. > > If you've more RAM than swap, it's very possible that any process, > but especially larger ones, could cause problems like this. > Fortunately, it's not too difficult to add some swap --- provided > you've some unformatted disk space available. I don't think that's the case. I did notice poorer performance while sshing into the box in the last few days. If the jdk does have a leak, that would explain it. I think I'll keep an eye on the size of the java process. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ top -b -d1 | grep java 1988 www 20 0 219M 34264K kserel 1:31 0.00% 0.00% java Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein
pgptSutjNg0DX.pgp
Description: PGP signature