> I have never been on a list from which I have received as much help as this
> one, which raises a question for me. I would like to thank the people who
> post questions to my answers, such as the fellow below, but don't want to
> spam people's inboxes and/or the with thank-you notes that may be archived
> for all time. Do people generally expect a note of thanks?
Well, it is considered a good thing to respond with some information
or statement indicating if and how something was actually successful in
fixing a problem so that that information will get archived.
You could include a brief thank you in that message.
Anyway, considering how much dross and OT rave-ons that get posted
to the list, I can't imagine that anyone would object to a pleasant
thank you now and then.
> On Friday 24 March 2006 11:47, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Mar 24), Oliver Iberien said:
> > > This may be a silly question, but I wanted to make sure:
> > >
> > > I have a SCSI R/W CD-ROM drive and an IDE DVD read-only drive. There
> > > have been times with linux where enabling SCSI emulation made the
> > > actual SCSI drive unavailable to k3b. I just want to make sure that
> > > adding ATAPICAM won't somehow get in the way of the actual SCSI
> > > device. Will it?
> > At worst it may shuffle the device number if the atapi drive gets
> > probed first.
> email@example.com mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"