On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:44:57PM -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > I would certainly recommend going with 6.x. The reason that many of our > servers still run 4.x is that 5.x got a bad reputation and there really > is no upgrade path from 4.x to 6.x. 5 and 6 default to using UFS2 and 4 > uses UFS so, IMHO it's better to rebuild and taking a few hundred users > offline for a couple of hours whilst this happens isn't fun.
FYI, there's no reason you need to switch to UFS2 to run 6. Kris
Description: PGP signature