Kevin Kinsey writes:

>  >> It's somewhat interesting (to me) that the even numbered releases
>  >> seem to have had longer and perhaps more successful runs than the
>  >> odd numbered ones.  5.X, in particular, seemed short to me.
>  >    Two comments:
>  >    1) Sample size = 2.
>  You may need to explain the math for that.  6 code trees, divided
>  by either the number of odds or evens, equals 3.

        I'm discarding 1.x as affected by outside events (the lawsuit)
and 6.x, as both a) uncompleted and b) done under a different formal
release structure.
        That leaves [2-5] - 4 units, or two pairs for comparison.

                                Robert Huff

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to