On Friday 05 May 2006 01:06, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Peggy Wilkins wrote:
> > > On 5/4/06, Jason Morgan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Did you run `extract' after your original `fetch'?
> > >
> > > Yes, I did; I followed the instructions exactly. I ran portsnap
> > > for the first time a couple weeks ago after which I successfully
> > > did a bunch of portupgrades. Then the ports tree sat there on my
> > > disk untouched for a couple of weeks until I ran "portsnap fetch
> > > update" today. For some reason it insisted that I needed to run
> > > "extract" when as far as I can tell that shouldn't have been
> > > necessary.
> > Do you have a ".portsnap.INDEX" file in your ports tree?
> Yes; I don't know if it was there before I ran portsnap today,
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1230186 May 4 16:39 .portsnap.INDEX
Have you stopped using cvsup for updating your ports? If you do, you're
going to have to use extract the next time you use portsnap.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"