On 10/5/06 09:18, "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Horne >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM >> To: email@example.com >> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo >> >> >> i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the only one >> who likes the >> new art. i think its very modern looking, crisp and abreviated, >> un-childish, but at the same time not too serious or ominous. >> >> ive actually thought about printing out some examples of both versions, >> carrying it down to our artists in our print studio, and "taste testing" >> them with professional artists who couldnt give one care about anything >> technical. *shrug* would be an interesting experiment, to say >> the least. >> > > Someone already posted a professional analysis. The summary was that > the new logo was amateurish with some serious flaws. Amateurish because > a ball is about the easiest thing you can produce in Photoshop and very > unoriginal. Serious flaws because due to all the shading this logo is > impossible to accurately reproduce on small items like business cards, > and on larger items the shading makes it very expensive to reproduce due > to the number of colors used. In fact, there are reduced colour versions for exactly that reason. Since you didn't bother to look for them, I guess this isn't the real issue for you, though. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"