On 12/05/06, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> On 11/05/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> >> Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with new
> >> ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time?
> >It was deliberate this time to avoid an extra ports freeze cycle,
> >since that has very high cost and the benefit is really low since the
> >intended audience for 5.5 is small and everyone who can do so will be
> >much better off with the enormous benefits of 6.
> Ahh makes sense to me now, since port freezes are annoying. So there
> is no danger of 5.5 been released after 5.4 EOL then?
Since the 5.4 EOL date has just been extended by several months I would say
that it seems exceedingly unlikely that 5.5 will be released after 5.4 is EOL.
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
yep seen the updated news :)
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"