>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik Trulsson >Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 12:40 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Recommendation for 1000BASE-SX card? > > >On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:01:08PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chuck Swiger >> >Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 8:24 AM >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: Re: Recommendation for 1000BASE-SX card? >> > >> > >[...] > >> >> > but I'm >> >generally of >> >the opinion that FreeBSD works just fine, most of the time, on >> >most hardware, >> >without any specific tweaking or tuning to be entirely usable. >> > >> >> It does not. In reality, current versions of FreeBSD work better >> on current versions of hardware. FreeBSD has a terrible history >> of breaking things that used to work on old hardware, then >> when someone complains that something is broken, the developers >> in effect tell them their old hardware is crappy junk and to buy new >> hardware. >> >> Try running FreeBSD 6.X on a 80486 or Pentium system. > >FreeBSD 6.x works just fine on a Pentium system, as long as you >have enough >memory. >
Most Pentium 60's and Pentium 133's shipped from the factory with no more than 32MB of ram. That's only enough to load FreeBSD itself, not any applications. I'm not talking your souped up Pentium 200 with 128MB of ram in it. But, even those will roll over and die if you try to bring up a desktop like gnome or KDE on them. Way way too slow. Ted _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"