Charlie Sorsby wrote:
Charlie Sorsby wrote:
[ ... ]
PS It would be really helpful if each port/package at freebsd.org
had an indication whether it requires the latest and greatest
version of freeBSD. Put another way, it would be nice to know the
oldest version of freeBSD it will work with. Perhaps that could be
included in the "Requires" list on the page for the port/package.
The people maintaining the ports attempt to support them on all of the active
versions of FreeBSD, which means 4.10 or 4.11, 5.3 and later, 6.0 and later,
and -CURRENT (what will become 7.0).
I find it hard to believe that 4.10 and 4.11 are even considered
"active versions"; I can't find anything about either at the web
site. Try putting 4.11 into the search box on the freebsd.org home
page.
4.11 is a legacy version and will be supported through Jan 31, 2007:
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
4.x is no longer recommended for a new installation.
Anyway, I'm afraid that I haven't had much luck with new versions
of ports relative to those distributed on the 4.11 CDROM and, in
fact, have had problems trying to install some of those. When I
installed 4.11, I did have sysinstall install /usr/ports. Frequently
trying even to install from that directory tree fails.
You need to update your ports tree. Read the fine documentation:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html
My experience has been that trying to install ports on 4.11
frequently produces complaints that it can't find some *4.11*
directory at freeBSD.org.
If your ports tree comes from the original CD, you're trying to fetch old
versions of the packages which have been updated since.
Support for 4.x is going away soon,
Are you sure it isn't already gone?
Yes.
however, and it will become more common for new ports to not
work on 4.x as time passes.
With each successive (major) version of freeBSD, it becomes less
and less like BSD and more and more "invented here." I suggest
that the "BSD" be dropped from the name of the operating system
currently being produced.
You're welcome to your opinion, even if it smells like flamebait to me.
For those ports that do not work with an older version like 4.x because of
features added to more recent versions of the operating system, ports usually
will indicate this in the Makefile.
Are you saying that the only way to tell is to fetch the new
version of the port, unpack it, and read the Makefile?
Nope. There's cvsweb access and sites like freshports.org...
I just looked in the Makefile for .../graphics/gphoto2 that I just
fetched from freeBSD.org -- specifically from:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=gphoto2&stype=all)
I could find nothing about an OS version but it may just be that I
don't know specifically what to look for.
In any event, build failed:
Thursday, 6 Jul, 2006 -- 10:56:22 MDT
=> gphoto2-2.2.0.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gphoto/.
gphoto2-2.2.0.tar.bz2 530 kB 25 kBps
===> Extracting for gphoto2-2.2.0
=> Checksum OK for gphoto2-2.2.0.tar.bz2.
===> Patching for gphoto2-2.2.0
-e: not found
*** Error code 127
Stop in /home/crs/Incoming/Ports/gphoto2.
Supporting sed -e/REINPLACE_CMD happened somewhere around 4.8 or 4.9, so your
version of the port Makefiles apparently predate this.
Your ports infrastructure is rather non-standard and being so far out-of-date,
isn't likely to work properly without being updated per the directions above,
although you could always go your own way and compile the software for yourself...
[ ... ]
Charlie
PS Having used "real" BSD (4.[123], SunOS 4.1, etc), I wouldn't even
buy a PC until FreeBSD became available. Now I find that each
successive release of free"BSD" is less and less BSD and more and
more something else. That's why I'm still using 4.11 (and probably
will continue to do). I think the powers-that-be at freebsd.org
should seriously consider dropping the "BSD" part of the name.
Yeah, you said that above, too. Feel free to use another operating system if
you find something that suits you better....
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
