Colin Percival wrote:
> There are still a lot of people (particularly on pre-6.0 systems) who
> are using CVSup rather than portsnap for updating their ports trees.

Also, I would guess that some people who run multiple FreeBSD systems,
use some sort of local propagation of either the entire ports tree, or
locally compiled packages.

I work as a sysadmin at the students computer lab at the mathematics
department at the Norwegian university of science and technology, and we
take this approach. Not that the maths department is a large one, but we
have fifty-some workstations and a couple of servers running FreeBSD.
Only one or two of which would show up in the portsnap stats.

        Svein Halvor

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to