Colin Percival wrote: > There are still a lot of people (particularly on pre-6.0 systems) who > are using CVSup rather than portsnap for updating their ports trees.
Also, I would guess that some people who run multiple FreeBSD systems, use some sort of local propagation of either the entire ports tree, or locally compiled packages. I work as a sysadmin at the students computer lab at the mathematics department at the Norwegian university of science and technology, and we take this approach. Not that the maths department is a large one, but we have fifty-some workstations and a couple of servers running FreeBSD. Only one or two of which would show up in the portsnap stats. Svein Halvor
Description: OpenPGP digital signature