COOOL!

I will definately look into this when i get home..
nice, thanks!

On 8/15/06, Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/14/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Gilberto,
>
> No, that wouldn't work, there is no sense in adding a nat rule to the
> internal interface.
>
> I just found out why it didn't work. All this time, I was using active
> ftp on my ubuntu box. when i switched to passive, it all worked like a
> charm. found it on some forum archive .. forgot the link. on linux the
> env setting for passive ftp doesn't work.. .i never knew that.. you
> have you add -p to the ftp command or start it using pftp..
>
> On 8/14/06, Gilberto Villani Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try using this rule:
> > nat on $int_if from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021
> >
> >
> > Gilberto
> >
> >
> > 2006/8/13, Ivan Levchenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > having some troubles with ftp-proxy on my gateway at home: the darn
> > thing gets me connected to an outside ftp server, but won't let me do
> > anything else with it.
> >
> > the gateway computer is freebsd (it is running pf with nat to share
> > and secure a pppoe connection); the client computer is running kubuntu
> > 6.06.
> >
> > any help (the right keyword to google with will be nice too!!!) will be
> > great!


I'm happilly using pftpx with no problems :-)

http://www.freshports.org/ftp/pftpx/

--
Joao Barros



--
Best Regards,

Ivan Levchenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to