ExTaZyTi wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I have problem with my network, I use 2 Network Cards in my FreeBSD
> computer
> and 1 Network Cards in WinXP Prof sp2,
> one of the network card - rl0 is my real static ip address with DHCP, 2
> network card is - rl1 is my local gateway ip: 192.168.0.1,
> I don't set the gateway for the rl1, just ip: 192.168.0.1, DNS from the
> ISP,
> mask: 255.255.255.0,..
> I precompiled my kernel with options FIREWALL, IPDIVER,
> IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT, IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE.
> ---------
> my /etc/rc.conf is:
> ---------
> gateway_enable="YES"
> firewall_enable="YES"
> firewall_script="/etc/firewall.sh"
> natd_enable="YES"
> natd_interface="rl1"
> natd_flags=""
> sendmail_enable="NONE"
> hostname="root.extremebg.biz"
> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP"
> linux_enable="YES"
> sshd_enable="YES"
> usbd_enable="YES"
> inetd_enable="NO"
> ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.0.1  netmask 255.255.255.0"
> hostname="root.extremebg.biz"
> ---------
> my /etc/firewall.sh is:
> ---------
> #!/bin/sh
> /sbin/ipfw -f flush
> /sbin/ipfw add 1000 pass all from any to any via lo0
> /sbin/ipfw add 1100 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8
> /sbin/ipfw add 1200 deny icmp from any to any frag
> /sbin/ipfw add 1300 deny icmp from any to any in icmptype
> 5,9,13,14,15,16,17
> /sbin/ipfw add 1400 deny tcp from any to any not established tcpflags fin
> /sbin/ipfw add 1500 deny tcp from any to any tcpflags
> fin,syn,rst,psh,ack,urg
> /sbin/ipfw add 1600 deny tcp from any to any tcpflags
> !fin,!syn,!rst,!psh,!ack,!urg
> /sbin/ipfw add 4000 deny udp from any 137-139 to any via rl0
> /sbin/ipfw add 4100 deny udp from any to any 137-139 via rl0
> /sbin/ipfw add 5000 divert natd ip from 192.168.0.0:255.255.255.128 to any
> out xmit rl1
> /sbin/ipfw add 5100 divert natd ip from any to 192.168.0.1

you should have a look at http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipfw.php -
especially the natd divert part (your divert uses the wrong interface imho)

> /sbin/ipfw add 5500 deny all from 192.168.0.0/24 to not
> 192.168.0.0/2480,21,443
> /sbin/ipfw add 600 allow all from any to any

i guess the last rule was just for test purpose, if not - first rule
that matches takes it - which means rule number 600 would "kill" your
whole firewall

> ---------
> my ifconfig is:
> ---------
> rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=8<VLAN_MTU>
>        inet6 fe80::2c0:26ff:fe5e:72a4%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
>        inet 85.239.153.142 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 85.239.153.255
>        ether 00:c0:26:5e:72:a4
>        media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>        status: active
> rl1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=8<VLAN_MTU>
>        inet6 fe80::2e0:4cff:fe3c:f2f%rl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
>        inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 192.168.0.127
>        ether 00:e0:4c:3c:0f:2f
>        media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>        status: active
> plip0: flags=108810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT> mtu 1500
> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
>        inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
>        inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
>        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> ---------
> my /etc/sysctl.conf is:
> ---------
> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
> ---------
> My network ISP gateway is: 85.239.153.129, submask: 255.255.255.128, my
> static real ip is: 85.239.153.142, my ISP DNS server is:
> 85.239.155.1.
> ---------
> 
> my pc start natd successfully, and other services ..
> -- 
> 
> my WinXP network configuration is:
> 
> DNS 85.239.155.1, gateway: 192.168.0.1, mask: 255.255.255.0, ip addess:
> 192.168.0.2.
> 
> I connected my computers in LAN, but not going traffic from my freebsd to
> the windows :(
> I don't know how to route traffic from FreeBSD to the windows :(
> please help

-- 
Armin Pirkovitsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to