On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:12:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >You're wrong. It's the other way around: > > > > We are *forced* to use CVSup, because CVS is centralized, without > > any other good way to mirror changesets to a distributed network of > > mirrors, users and developer workspaces. > > > >On the other hand, SVN is centralized too :-) > > What I wanted to say is that FreeBSD will remain for the time being, on > cvs - is that correct?
Until we're happy with another tool and have reasons that make moving worth the effort, we'll stay with CVS. This is /not/ because of the CVSup infrastructue though, which is essentially good at throwing arbitrary filesets around and doesn't tie us to CVS. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere
Description: PGP signature