PF, for two reasons. Firstly, because I don't have to mess with
arbitrary rule numbers; I can just scroll down the page and know that
rules will be executed in that order. Secondly becuase I can easily
integrate bruteforceblocker.

On 10/28/06, David Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,

IPFW seems to be the same IPFW that is used on MacOSX, so it seems to
make sense to learn and lean on IPFW when using in a mixed Machine
Environment. On the other side, many People seem to say PF is easier
to manage once a setup gets complicated. As usual, both sides have
their own valid points. My question though is not whether any of the
two , IPFW of PF is better then the other, but which of the two do
you use, and why?

Thanks,
David

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"



--
I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to