On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:27:47AM +0300, John Smith wrote: > On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: > >> Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to > >> ensure full update-ness? > > > >Shouldn't really matter, the relevant changes were in the kernel. > > > >Kris > > > > When was this corrected? Is 6.2 going to be faster than 6.1?
As I said earlier, some of the most important changes that went into 6.0 were fixing performance problems in 5.x. Since then it's been a process of polishing and improving, instead of architectural changes. So 6.2 is expected to be "better" than 6.1 but probably not measurably faster for general workloads. > Did the guys port the libthr changes into 6.2 or not? Dunno what you mean here. Kris
Description: PGP signature