In response to "Jeff Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Is a stock kernel config the 'fast' way to go on these CPUs?
> Sure wish there was an 'options  I_WANNA_GO_FAST' or an  'options
> RICKY_BOBBY' that would just do all the right things.
> Still not sure which scheduler to go with..

Unless something has changed very recently, most of the schedulers are
considered "experimental" and have known bugs.  The only one that I know
is stable is SCHED_4BSD.  Apparently, SCHED_ULE has some nice performance
improvements when it's not causing panics.

If you're not interested/capable in doing kernel debugging, you probably
want to go with SCHED_4BSD.  It would appear that some day SCHED_ULE will
replace it, but not yet.

Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended 
recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an 
intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is prohibited.  Please notify the 
sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
delete this e-mail from your system.

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to