On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
> >
> > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
> > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and
> > maybe take active maintainership of it.
> >
> > You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports
> > will be met by a grinning "we told you so".
> >
>
> Thank you Andrew,
>
> I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on
> FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make
> sure.

That's strange. I've used ULE for months on many boxes, but
much as I like it, I have to admit there are serious problems
with it. There are different reports, but it's clear you can't use
it in production environments. It might be okay to run it on your
{desk,lap}top system, though, but PC-BSD developers have
yet to comment on their reasoning.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


 I recommende not to use the ULE for production, months ago, my backup
server start crashing, until someone told me to disable ULE_ and enable the
old 4BSD scheduler, check
this posts:


http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-October/132966.html

  My system back to normal after i disable ULE.

  Greetings.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to