On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Kevin Sanders wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less configuration
is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go through series of
hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs and without the risk of
terminally damaging any local FS is priceless. If qemu can be tricked into
disk-less booting, it should be just as good though.
Alexander, when you say disk-less configuration, are you referring to
booting from a network image/server? That's an interesting idea. I'm
fairly new to FreeBSD development also, and prefer the speed of a dedicated
box, but recently suffered my first corrupted beyond repair system.
This is exactly the setup I use also. Most typically, the setup involves a
central development server running -STABLE, with a private network link to a
series of crash boxes. The development server NFS exports a file system to
use as an NFS root and for file sharing, as well as running tftp and dhcp
servers. The test boxes use PXE to boot fom the central server. Each test
system has its own exported root, so I can use individual loader.conf's to
tell test systems to boot off NFS, boot off local disks, etc. I always load
the kernel over NFS using pxeboot, regardless of whether I boot boxes with a
You get some very nice effects -- you can easily move boxes between FreeBSD
versions by switching out root file system symlinks, you can be building the
next kernel while the previous one dumps core, etc.
Robert N M Watson
University of Cambridge
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"