El domingo 17 de diciembre a las 21:53:00 CET, Greg Groth escribió: > Beech Rintoul wrote: > >On Sunday 17 December 2006 07:31, Greg Groth wrote: > >>I'm attempting to update Audacious without much luck. Last time I ran > >>into this issue, I simply had to do a make deinstall / make install, and > >>it worked fine. This time, I'm unable to deinstall the old version. > >>When running make deinstall from the ports directory I get: > >> > >>===> Deinstalling for multimedia/audacious > >>===> audacious-1.1.2 has a different PREFIX: /usr/X11R6, skipping > >> > >>Any ideas on how I can deinstall this port? I checked > >>/usr/ports/UPDATING, but didn't seem to find anything (unless I made a > >>typo in my text search). > > > >Portupgrade or portmaster are your friends. > > It failed with portmanager, so I tried portupgrade to see what the > problem was. When I ran portupgrade, I got the following: > > Note: Configure has discovered that you already have Audacious installed > and it does not match with the given --prefix. You have Audacious > installed in /usr/X11R6/bin and you chose /usr/local/bin. > > If you don't want two copies of Audacious installed, rerun configure > with the --prefix option set to the location of the old Audacious, or > uninstall the old Audacious. > > After compiling for a bit, it exited with the following error: > > playlist.c: In function `playlist_entry_get_info': > playlist.c:181: error: structure has no member named `mtime'
> [ ............... ] > > Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/audacious. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade.81965.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=audacious-1.1.2 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.1.2 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > > > I think I had similar issues in the past when I tried to update > Audacious, and a make deinstall / make install clean fixed the problem. > This is when I attempted to deinstall Audacious, and was unable to. > I've never tried portmaster, but I'm thinking it only works if you > install from packages (please correct me if I'm wrong), and I have > everything compiled from source. Any ideas? I had exactly the same problem as you. IMHO, it should be reported to the mantainer as a problem report. Look at the thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-August/034600.html Regards
Description: PGP signature