On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:54:22 +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway. Could someone tell me whether it is possible or not? >> Does anyone know a solution for assigning a jail to a trusted network >> through a tunnel without any influence on the base system's networking? > > I can use my pptp address from within a jail, of course the tunnel is > already > up and visible to the base system. You can also get the "secondary IP > address > effect" for your jail using a loopback interface. For example: > ng0 126.96.36.199 <-> 188.8.131.52 > lo1 184.108.40.206 > 220.127.116.11 would also be your jail address, totally unrelated to the > tunnel. > > I am not sure what you are looking for. Perhaps > you should explain a bit further. Nikos > i do not really have a complete plan at the moment but an idea to use a jail on my remote system as a sandbox. i mean i would like to set up a jail and use it (sometimes) as client / virtual machine in a remote network through some kind of tunneling without any modification to the base system and sometimes as a regular host to test and compile some completelydifferent stuff. i suspect that it is impossible but it might look like as configuring a pseudo device (eg gre) and use only pure ip traffic through the base system's nat until the jail's endpoint. to be honest i am pretty new to freebsd jails so i might be wromg. so please correct me if you know more. :) of course the best solution would be to use true virtualization. anyway do you know anything about the xen dom0 status on freebsd x86 smp? :) andras _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"