On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:28 -0000, Petr Slansky wrote: >Hello! > >I tried to install FreBSD 4.7 on i486@133 with 16MB of Ram and 200MB disk. W95 >worked nice on that machine. I failed to install a minimal configuration of >FreeBSD on such hardware!! Is it ok? I wanted only basic console... > >I noticed that many source files (*.h) were instaled to my disk. Is it ok?? >From my point of view, instalation could be more scalable, minimal could be >more minimal. > >This is not a big problem for me, I will run W95 on my old pc as I did. I was >only suprised how big modern FreeBSD is. Is it necessary? I like new programs, >more options, but I would like to have an option to add them only when I need >them.
if you need something that minimal, look for picobsd or minux. the smallest hd i've ever used freebsd 4.x on was an 850meg on a 486/133.. i'd get a p1-100 with a little more ram. people throw them away everyday --- doug reynolds | the maverick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message