On 2/6/07, David Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot, Our current backup system is veritas netbackup, and changing > that to entire bacula is best thing for me, May I ask why you would prefer Bacula over NetBackup? I'm just curious, because having worked with both, I personally prefer NetBackup. > so they wanted me encrypt these files, that is on the backup location > before the netbackup scheduler picks up these files. > > Database is getting backed up to a disk location and from there netbackup > agent picks up and writes it into the tape , but we have these 13 flat files > that go into offsite which really needs encryption and decryption logic in > place upon after restore back to disk . If those databases are all Oracle instances, then you might want to take a look at Oracle Secure Backup. It does exactly what you need. More info here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/secure-backup/index.html Cheers,
Thanks a lot , but we are on Oracle9i database, the Oracle secure backup they are talking would be nice on 10G onwards _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
