A rule of thumb is to configure as much service as you need (in this
case, dhcpd), with as little overhead as you can get away with (a
simple jail vs. a full-blown VM).
SC
On 2/22/07, Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Nielsen, referring to running multiple DHCPD's, writes:
> For what you're talking about, jails make a lot more sense than
> virtualization or emulation.
Thank you! That is exactly the kind of input I was
looking for. As soon as I read yours and Frank Staals' mention
of jails, it clicked. A true jail will have a little version of
as much of the FreeBSD world as dhcpd needs to run. This should
be much easier on resources and more predictable as to results.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
