On 08/04/07, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i was setting up bind9 today in 2 jails.  1 jails is the master, and the
the slave.  i am reloading 2 machines that were previously physical
into these jails.  the master went fine, both internal and external views
work as expected.

setting up the slave, was not so smooth.  i recovered my named.conf from
backup, and then removed the external portion of the zones (i dont feel like
messing with trouble invovlved with setting up the 2nd ip on the jail).
the past few days while i was setting this up, the master was already in
operation, and has had several edits to a few zones.  when i reloaded the
slave versions from backup into my new slave, and started named, the slaved
did not update their zonefiles to match the new serial numbers.    i fixed
this by stopping named, deleting the zone files, and restarting it again.
thankfully, the slave zones all instantly populated, creating matching
numbers to the ones that are running on the master.

do master-to-slave transfers work as expected in a jail, or did i just see
some abnormal behavior (possibly due to me not waiting long enough for
transfer to happen on its own)?

Jonathan Horne

Its an error in your config, as running BIND works perfectly fine
under a jail in Master/Slave config for me.

Without seeing config, cant really help or maybe better on the BIND
mailing list?

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to