On May 23, 2007, at 19:03, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology but the restore methodology.
Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question, so let me try it this way
I'm looking for a backup solution that I can rely on in the event I
have a catastrophic server failure. Ideally this backup would look
and act much like a clone of the production system. In the worse
case, I'd re-format the server array and copy the clone back to the
server, setup the boot blocks, and that would be it.
Ideally this clone should be verifiable, meaning I should be able
to verify it's integrity so that it's not going to let me down if I
I'm thinking external USB hard drive of at least equal size to the
server array size as far as hardware goes, but I'm lost as far as
What kind of data are you backing up? If you are backing up the
system and your data then you have to be very careful about links.
Some backup solutions will copy the files as separate files. When
you restore the link is gone. An update to one of the linked files
will no longer be seen by the other names. The OS uses a lot of
links. If all you are backing up is data, its probably not an
issue. I have used both dump and tar successfully. I currently use
tar as I have many directories I don't want to backup. Tar requires
some care and feeding to handle links properly. It doesn't do it by
default. Dump does handle them properly by default. Another option
is rsync. The advantage it has is that it only copies the changes in
the file. It will run a lot faster than dump or tar which will copy
everything each time. You do have to be careful with /dev if you are
copying the root partition.
One backup disk is not all that great a safety approach. You will
never know if that drive has failed till you try and use it. Then
its too late. Failures do not require that the drive hardware has
failed. Any interruption in the copy can cause an issue that may not
be detected during the backup. Sectors generally don't just go bad
sitting on the shelf, but it does happen. That was a significant
problem with tapes. Generally 25% of the tapes I used to get back
from off-site storage after a month were no longer readable.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"