Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 04/06/07, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

both of these have been confirmed numerous times by different people
so sweeping them under the carpet and saying they simply not true
would be wrong.

My detailed measurements of disk performance and those of others I am
aware of contradicts your claim: 6.x equals or outperforms 4.x on disk
I/O (depends on driver) and filesystem I/O.  The only true part of it
is the "under QUOTA" part, which as you know from past discussions, is
still under Giant in 6.x.  As you also know, there is a patch to
address this which is awaiting user testing.  Have you tested it yet?


Kris -

It's been awhile since I tracked -current, so forgive me if this is
a stupid question but ... Is it the case that the 6.x drivers are
all now SMP-safe or do some still live under GIANT?

Tim Daneliuk     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key:

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to